Justice Antonin Scalia’s dissent (pdf) in U.S. v. Windsor, the ruling that struck down the Defense of Marriage Act, is not subtle in its anger. The conservative Supreme Court jurist refers on page 22, for example, to the “legalistic argle-bargle” the court majority uses as its rationale. And as Paul Waldman explained, the dissent goes […]Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Clik here to view.
